How to win wars...

First: War is unaccptable. War is never the best course of action. War is bad. All the same goes for violence.

That being said, it may be impossible to initiate and win a war...

in war, an offensive posture will almost certainly defeat a defensive posture, and here is why:

to defeat the enemy, lest assume you must kill them (permit metaphor and this isnt so difficult)
For a party in an offensive posture, there is a necessary/unavoidable series of events which will lead to victory, in an offensive course of action, identification and plans for exploitation of the enemy's weaknesses is a precursor to engagement. upon engagement, the military's immediate course of action is killing the enemy (via execution of the "plan").
Now, the party in the defensive posture has their own unavoidable steps towards victory. First and foremost, they wait. They wait to be attacked. maybe with some minor scout type excursions but no real offensive moves (for they would no longer be in a defensive posture and this discussion irrelevant). Once the enmy has initiated engagement, the defensive party must now identify the enemys weaknesses, plan the weaknesses exploitation, and finally execute the exploitation. all the while, the offense is killing off the defense. this series of events can take an hour, or even just a few seconds. So all this in place, for every 1 action the offense makes, the defense must make 3. Which, all things being equal, means a 3 to 1 kill ratio. In reality there are endless strategic adjustments that can be made to even and to reverse this ratio. regardless this is the starting point for war. Advantage - Offense. Furthermore, the offense has another luxury. At any point, the offense can choose to disengage and reset their assessement and plan, then redeploy their execution. the defense does nothave this option. if things are not going well, the offense pauses the engagement and resets their advantages. if things are not going well for the defense, they get killed.

This is where the catch is. Once achieving victory, the offense necessarily assumes a defensive posture. victory does not end a war. victory ends a battle. for a war to end, BOTH parties must cease fighting. if thedefeated party, no matter how small, continues to be "at war" then they will be assuimng the offenisve posture versus the victors, who are now in a defensive posture. theis goes along with the 3 to 1 kill ratio advantage. so i conclude that "all things being equal", in order to win a battle/war from a defensive posture, one must have a MINIMUM of three times as many soldiers as the enemy. Good Luck.

So You Want To Know The Truth, eh?

The truth is that, yes, we are the aliens. The inside of our bodies does not look the way we think it does. We, along with the physical bodies we think/thought are complete have another physical component. We are full of incredibly thin black fibers, Roughly a centimeter+ in length, virtually immeasurable in width, they flow easily throughout our bodies, through the walls of our organs. The collective existence of these fibers are what give us our consciousness, our distinctive self awareness, our creativity. What places humans in the likeness of god is our ability to be individually & originally creative; as many a jerk-off would say, "to think outside the box."
We first must realize that the box is smaller than we realize. Self-awareness does exist inside the box. Animals are not stupid. If anything, we are the one's being stupid. Animals, your pets even, try to communicate with you all the time. But you just sit there and talk to them... THEY CAN'T TALK! In fact they sense, experience, and think a bit differently than we do, but they know they're alive. They know they exist. When they acknowledge your existence by looking you in the eye, they're usually trying to communicate with you. You're just too dense to figure it out. Anyway, other living things live inside the box. They're complete. They're satisfied. As species they'll adapt as their environment changes, but as a general rule, they're not having many big breakthroughs, changing the face of their way of life almost over night. We are not home yet. Therefore we have that creative ability that sets us apart. We're collectively figuring out how to get to our next destination; to the next step towards home.
So, you cut open your arm on a nail sticking out from a wall. Why aren't bajillions of these little, thin, black threads (threads' from here on) pouring out of the cut? I still have two possible answers. I'll give you my best guess for now. As you'll come to see, we are inter-dimensional beings. The threads are in four dimensions. Exposure to air is fatal. That is, exposure to Three dimensional space is fatal. If you suddenly lost all your width, you'd probably die, right?

Gotta make a phone call. I'll try to get back to this later...

Notes on where this is going:

threads attraction to alcohol
alcoholism
gorging? Lose a dimension...
die perhaps - come to exist in the 3 dimensional reality...
as the three dimensional world "attacks" they flee.
stop the bleeding
the remainder turn into thin black/red threads / mixed with blood.
next time u r actively bleeding...
pupils
pupils are sensing our next step on the path.
we are becoming light
virtual reality is to develop into the next step
light is two dimensional space
that's why television is so captivating.
we are creating a two dimensional space for us to exist in and we will exist there in a likeness of ourselves. Example - SOCOM. We too are created in the image of god, in the likeness of our 4 dimensional selves - we are the creator, we are god.

ControNewsReal - Contronewsreal - Controversial

just an idea for an 'extreme' news show

When broke during Christmas...

Remember, laughter and orgasms are free.

Busting out tonight. (panting...)

regarding the overt nuclear programs in iran and korea...

sure, they are very dangerous and worthy of opposition. However, i would be more concerned with covert prorams developing killing technology of an even more advanced nature... say perhaps like the ones the united states runs. we insist on the translucency of other governments yet do not provide it ourselves. sure we and 6 others can have nuclear technology, but the rest of you have to burn coal (except for israel - we'll just let them use our nuclear capabilities.)

COME ON PEOPLE!!!! WHO IS TERRORIZING WHO?!?!?!?

IDIOTS.

you are what you eat

just because you dont turn into a cow overnight, it doesnt mean you arent slowly turning into one, or perhaps evovlving into...
or perhaps that is where your sould most recently was, therefore you have a "taste" for that food...

Being an individual is the first step in achieving unity.
independence is the key to unity.
independence is the key to unification.

the japanese are fish.
lol

id rather be a fish than an ear of corn or a cow.

dont steal from individuals - life is hard enough without in-fighting.

anarchy is the ultimate destination of a positively evolving society.

Stop hoarding, there's enough for everyone.

we only want what is denied to us.

Got Good Stuff

The terrorist attacks of 9/11 had a clear design -
Hit key american icons:
Economic - Twin Towers
Military - Pentagon
Government - White House (or whatever, Failed)

Taking a look at this design, wouldn't you say there's a very important oversight?

RELIGIOUS. This is not a Holy War against the US's citizens or Christians..
I think it may be a wake-up call.

the concept of afro-americans, asian-americans, mexican-americans, etc. is separatist propaganda. fight back. the only citizens of the united states that truely exist are Americans. This must be internalized to progress.

yep, im starting to poop...

well, that's what all this writting is liek. i have MUCH to write about, but getting the flow going is the difficulty. so i gad a ghought that you go avter you "mother" and then your "father" as your oppoenents and see what happens. what the heck am i talking about... i need sleep.
i was thinking about the romans, greeks, and midaeval times and their govenments. it seems to me that we a re no better than them. i always cringed thinking of the peasants being taxed by the lord in his castle. now i realize, it's no different here now. our government is no different. if we dont pay, we are taken away and confined, if we dont follow their rules about how to live OUR lives, we are taken away and confined. and so on and so on.
we are being controled against our will by our own govenment. they do their best to keep it covert, ut its starting to leak pretty bad.i want amERICa back!

THE BLOGS "RECENTLY UPDATED"

CAPITALISM IS A PLAGUE. THEY HAVE EVERY right to be posting their advertisement blogs over and over nd over and over and over and over. and i have very ricght to be irritated by it. even here in what is suposed to be a new arena of free thoght, and sharing of ideas and communication in general, capitalism and the pursuit of wealth rears its ugly head., F.G.B. u know what it means.,..

building a fence between us and mexico is idiotic. canada and mexico in this supposed terorist world, MUST be our closest frinds. the second the mexican (president?) showed serious objection, our leaders (ugh) should have pulled back and thought for a minute.
one, this is jsut for show. a fence isnt gonna keep anyone out. 2. alright if we f up getting acreoos the border, you thing terrorkists might offer them assistence in crossing the border, or pay them to help? you think they're more likely to cooperate if we're being separatist assholes? you bet they are. FGB

cheers

Nothing is better than uninspired.

That looks like a sentence fragment. But it's not. It needs quotations around "nothing" and "uninspired" and some way to deduce that uninspired is describing posting/writting... but this is nonsense...

Give and Take relationships are not preferable. infact they initiate inequality, but i digress.
What we mean is"give and receive" relationships.
One cannoth "receive" unless someone has first "given".
On the other hand, one is very much able to "take" in the absence of any "giving".
From the numerous definitions of take, there are some consistencies:
- There is an implied negativity of some sort.
- The act is agressive. i.e. take is an active verb.
Conversely, receive does not appear in the absense of some type of "giving" imediately preceeding it.
- receive i a passive verb. there is a sense of openness and positivity through out the definitions.

So STOP SAYING "GIVE AND TAKE!" SAY "GIVE AND RECEIVE!"
Even though you dont mean take, and people generally understand that, the mere utterance of the word still effects the world in its direcetion, and add in the millions of people saying it, and you have a very powreful negative force. donet do it. sorry, i got itred of correcting my rusty typing.

LIFE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE AN ENDLESS COMPETITION FOR POWER AND SUPERIORITY. IN FACT ATTEMPTS TO AQUIRE SUCH THINGS WILL ULTIMATELY ONLY TEACH THE SEEKER THAT THEY IN FACT DO NOT EXIST.

YOU ARE A GOOD PERSON. AND NO, THAT DOESNT NECESSARILY IMPLY THE EXISTENCE OF A "BAD PERSON" JUST TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY AND BALANCE.